| [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] |
Re: nsmon question
|
On Thu, Aug 27/98, TTSG <ttsg@ttsg.com> wrote:
> >
> > I had problems with the new 'AUTH' statements; even when my servers were
> > authoritative they would come up. I removed the AUTH statement and it
> > works OK (of course you lose the functionality that the AUTH statement
> > gives you)
> >
> I think you've got it implemented wrong.
>
> What this says is "I have a domain, istar.ca . The first server
> thats authoritative for is is called mail, its at 154.11.136.66. The
> second server is called news, its at 154.11.136.66. The third.............."
>
> I believe it only has the ability to tell you that the server is
> authoritative for the domain, not hosts in the domain.
Hmm. I'm not disputing you're correct in this assessment, but it's
curious that nsmon has been running like this for a week or so and only
today did these go critical at the same time the nameserver in question
is returning non-authoritive answers for those hosts.
The man page does seem to imply you are correct though. I wonder why
they only went critical today.
Would anyone else find the way I thought it was supposed to work more
useful?
--
Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.
GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v
b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*
|